To hear about similar clinical trials, please enter your email below
Trial Title:
Comparison of the OSHO Protocol to a Standard Arm Protocol of the German AML Intergroup in Patients With AML<60a
NCT ID:
NCT01414231
Condition:
Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
Conditions: Official terms:
Leukemia, Myeloid
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
Cytarabine
Conditions: Keywords:
AML
acute myeloid leukaemia
low vs intermediate dose AraC
CR rate
patients <60 years
Study type:
Interventional
Study phase:
Phase 3
Overall status:
Unknown status
Study design:
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention model:
Parallel Assignment
Primary purpose:
Treatment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Intervention:
Intervention type:
Drug
Intervention name:
Cytarabine
Description:
Intermediate dose against low dose; IDA 12 mg/m2 iv days 1 - 3 and AraC 2 x 1 g/m2 bid on
days 1+3+5+7 vs. AraC 100 mg/m2/day i.v.-for 7 days and Daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/Tag on days
3, 4 und 5.
Arm group label:
Cytarabine intermediate dose
Arm group label:
Cytarabine low dose
Summary:
This protocol is part of the German AML Intergroup Trial, where the OSHO study arm is
compared to the common German standard arm after randomization in a 9:1 ratio. The
hypothesis involves primarily dosing and application of AraC for induction. It is
expected that CR rates and as a consequence also LFS are higher in protocols using higher
AraC compared to lower doses and that LFS might be superior in the study specific arm
compared to the golden standard published several years ago. In the standard arm, AraC
100mg/m2/day is given as continuous infusion over 7 days. Daunorubicin is given as 60
mg/m2/day over a two hours infusion on days 3, 4 und 5. On day 22 a second induction
course is applied. After reaching CR, three cycles of AraC 3 g/m2 over three hours bid
are infused on day 1, 3 und 5. In contrast the OSHO arm consists of induction therapy
with IDA 12 mg/m*2 over 20-30-min-iv on day 1 - 3 and AraC 2 x 1 g/m*2 bid over 3-h-iv on
days 1+3+5+7.
A previous phase II study of the OSHO has shown high CR in patients with relapsed AML
using MitoFlag. In this study we asked the question if MitoFlag is superior to IdaAraC in
newly diagnosed AML patients without CR after the first induction chemotherapy. Therefore
patients are randomized to receive either MitoFlag or IdaAraC and the difference in CR
rates evaluated.
It is still unclear if two consolidation therapies are needed before allogeneic or
autologous stem cell transplantation. This question is being addressed in the second part
of the OSHO study, where patients are randomized to receive either one or two
consolidation therapies.
In this study all patients with AML and an age of 18-60 years except M3 are entered
Criteria for eligibility:
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult patients < or = 60 years acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) AML t(8;21)(q22;q22),
AML1 (CBFa)/ETO, AML(inv(16)(p13q22)) und variants (CBFb/MYH11), AML 11q23,
MLL-anomalies, AML with normal karyotyp myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)RAEBT with 20-30%
blasts.
de novo AML secundary AML after MDS secundary AML after chemotherapy with alkylantien
sekundäre AML after chemotherapy with Epipodophyllotoxin informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
AML M3 patients included in another clinical trial contraindications for high dose
cytotoxic therapy such as renal insufficiency liver insufficiency cardiac insufficiency
NYHA III + IV, acute myocardial infarction uncontroled infection like pneumonia with
hypoxemia or septic schock pregnancy Karnofski-Index of 10 and less second maligancy
severe, decompensated metabolism disorders
Gender:
All
Minimum age:
18 Years
Maximum age:
60 Years
Healthy volunteers:
No
Locations:
Facility:
Name:
University of Leipzig, Hematology
Address:
City:
Leipzig
Zip:
04103
Country:
Germany
Status:
Recruiting
Contact:
Last name:
Dietger Niederwieser
Phone:
+4934197
Phone ext:
13050
Email:
dietger@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Start date:
April 2002
Completion date:
July 2014
Lead sponsor:
Agency:
University of Leipzig
Agency class:
Other
Source:
University of Leipzig
Record processing date:
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on November 12, 2024
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov page:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01414231