To hear about similar clinical trials, please enter your email below
Trial Title:
Representations, Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Hypnosis in Patients Followed for Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID:
NCT05791747
Condition:
Cancer Colorectal
Hypnosis, Animal
Conditions: Official terms:
Colorectal Neoplasms
Conditions: Keywords:
cancer colorectal
hypnose
representations
Study type:
Observational [Patient Registry]
Overall status:
Not yet recruiting
Study design:
Time perspective:
Other
Intervention:
Intervention type:
Other
Intervention name:
semi-structured interviews
Description:
This is an observational study Patients included in the study will conduct
semi-structured interviews to discuss their knowledge and/or experience with supportive
care, particularly hypnosis
Summary:
Over the past decade, changes in knowledge and attitudes toward complementary and
alternative medicine have been occurring. One study shows that 21% of patients are
turning to them. In contrast, hypnosis is among the least used. While perceptions of
alternative medicine are improving, there is still widespread skepticism about the
beliefs of hypnosis and this may explain why patients are not turning to it. Although its
use in oncology is no longer in question, and its efficacy in the management of side
effects has been demonstrated, no recent qualitative study has been conducted to examine
the representations of hypnosis among cancer patients. It therefore seems relevant to us
today to know the evolution of the representations and attitudes of cancer patients
towards hypnosis.
Detailed description:
Cancer patients experience psychological difficulties during the disease, associated with
treatment, and even in the post-treatment period. Among the most common, they mention
emotional distress, significant fatigue, sleep disturbance, or pain. Several authors
agree that there is a cluster of four core symptoms associated with the disease and its
treatments, including fatigue, nausea/vomiting, depression and pain. These symptoms have
a significant impact on daily activities, resulting in a decrease in quality of life.
Reducing the symptoms of cancer to the sole etiology of the disease or its treatments
does not allow us to consider a management action. Indeed, patients with cancer face the
diagnosis and follow a course of care that includes many medical therapies (surgery,
chemotherapy, radiotherapy, etc.). Integrative medicine takes into account the need for
these medical therapies by adding the importance of supportive care for patients.
Specifically, the expected effects are to reduce the after-effects for people thanks to
an offer of support care adapted to their needs and regularly evaluated, ensuring a
better quality of life immediately and in the longer term, as well as by providing
information that allows patients to make the most informed choices possible.
Physical activity, dietary monitoring, and psychosocial interventions remain the most
common complementary therapies offered to patients to reduce treatment side effects.
Among this wide choice, patients can find themselves lost. Over the past decade, changes
in knowledge and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine have been
occurring. For example, one study found that 21% of patients are turning to them,
indicating a growing interest in this type of care.
While perceptions of alternative medicine are improving, there is still widespread
skepticism about hypnosis. As a result, even though scientific research shows positive
effects of this type of therapy, a 2006 study in Canada found that out of 15 breast
cancer patients using psychosocial therapies, only 6% used hypnosis. Another study
conducted in 2018 confirms these results: on a population of 212 patients with different
cancers, it appears that hypnosis is the therapy least used and whose interest is lowest.
Few studies have been conducted to determine the reasons for this lack of interest or the
beliefs that are associated with hypnosis. Existing research suggests that patients lack
information about hypnosis and its effectiveness, may have ambivalent perceptions about
it or be skeptical of its effectiveness, and that their beliefs may be influenced by the
media. Specifically, one study point out that positive attitudes toward hypnosis are even
associated with better hypnotic response. While its use in oncology is no longer in
question, no recent qualitative study has been conducted questioning the representations
of hypnosis with cancer patients. It therefore seems relevant to us today to know the
evolution of the representations and attitudes of cancer patients towards hypnosis. To do
this, and according to Leventhal's model of self-regulation, the information obtained by
a patient, whether or not it is medically based, is integrated by the patient in order to
provide a "lay" understanding of the subject in question. Activated representations may
then be guided by the individual's current and prior awareness or by social messages from
perceived significant others or authoritative sources and this impacts attitudes.
The aim of the study was to investigate psychosocial representations related to hypnosis
in colorectal cancer patients and to assess the impact of these representations on the
intention to use hypnosis.
Criteria for eligibility:
Study pop:
Men and women diagnosed with colorectal cancer, still in treatment or not.
Sampling method:
Non-Probability Sample
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. Having been diagnosed with colorectal cancer
3. Able to understand and read French
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Patients who do not have a telephone or devices that allow remote interviewing
2. Medical (neurological, psychiatric, etc.) or psychological conditions that do not
allow participation in the study (completion of the consent form and coherent speech
for the interview)
3. Hearing impaired patient without hearing aids
4. Patient under guardianship or court protection
Gender:
All
Minimum age:
18 Years
Maximum age:
N/A
Healthy volunteers:
No
Locations:
Facility:
Name:
Université de Nîmes
Address:
City:
Nîmes
Zip:
30000
Country:
France
Start date:
March 21, 2023
Completion date:
June 30, 2023
Lead sponsor:
Agency:
University of Nimes
Agency class:
Other
Source:
University of Nimes
Record processing date:
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on November 12, 2024
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov page:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05791747