To hear about similar clinical trials, please enter your email below
Trial Title:
AI as an Aid for Weekly Symptom Intake in Radiotherapy
NCT ID:
NCT06525181
Condition:
Radiotherapy Side Effect
Pelvic Cancer
Patient
Conditions: Official terms:
Pelvic Neoplasms
Conditions: Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence
Patient-Reported Outcome
Study type:
Interventional
Study phase:
N/A
Overall status:
Recruiting
Study design:
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention model:
Parallel Assignment
Primary purpose:
Other
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Intervention:
Intervention type:
Other
Intervention name:
Generative Artificial Intelligence
Description:
Gen AI assisted symptom intake summarization
Arm group label:
AI-assisted symptom intake
Intervention type:
Other
Intervention name:
Standard weekly symptom intake
Description:
Standard weekly symptom intake performed by a physician
Arm group label:
Standard weekly symptom assessment by physicians
Summary:
The study investigates the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models
(LLMs) to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of weekly treatment consultations (OTVs) in
radiotherapy. It hypothesizes that an AI-enabled symptom summary tool will match
traditional medical review methods in accuracy while saving time. The study includes
patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy and excludes those with pelvic reirradiation or
who have undergone surgery. Patients will receive both standard and AI-assisted weekly
consultations, with AI summaries generated using the OpenAI GPT-4 API. Blinded
oncologists will compare the accuracy and quality of the AI-generated and
doctor-generated summaries, while patients and doctors will rate these summaries. The
primary objective is to evaluate the accuracy and time efficiency of AI-assisted symptom
summaries compared to traditional methods.
Detailed description:
This clinical trial is a comparative study designed to evaluate the accuracy and time
efficiency of an AI-enabled symptom summary tool in comparison to traditional medical
review methods in patients undergoing radiotherapy in the pelvic region.
Hypothesis:
The AI-enabled symptom summary tool is hypothesized to be non-inferior in accuracy to
traditional medical review methods and to save time in the process.
Primary Outcome:
Accuracy of Documentation: The quality of the documentation will be evaluated using the
Physician Documentation Quality Instrument-9 (PDQI-9), a validated questionnaire that
assesses nine key elements of documentation quality: completeness, correctness,
consistency, comprehensibility, relevance, organization, conciseness, formatting, and
overall impression. Blinded specialist doctors will use the PDQI-9 to evaluate both
AI-generated and traditional summaries, assigning scores from 1 to 10.
Secondary Outcomes:
Time Efficiency: The time required to complete the AI-enabled and traditional
consultations will be recorded and compared.
Physician Satisfaction: A custom-designed satisfaction questionnaire will be administered
to the physicians participating in the study. This questionnaire will include
Likert-scale questions to rate various aspects of satisfaction, including ease of use,
time efficiency, accuracy perception, and overall satisfaction.
Patient Satisfaction: A custom-designed satisfaction questionnaire will be administered
to the patients participating in the study. This questionnaire will include Likert-scale
questions to rate various aspects of satisfaction, including clarity and understanding,
perceived accuracy, engagement and interaction, and overall satisfaction.
Methodology:
Patient Selection: Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be selected for
participation. Exclusion criteria will be applied to eliminate cases of pelvic
reirradiation or prior operations in the pelvic region.
Consultation Process: Patients will undergo a standard weekly consultation with a doctor.
In the same week, each patient will also have a separate consultation with a different
doctor. During this second consultation, a symptom questionnaire will be completed under
medical supervision. The resulting summary from this questionnaire will be generated
using the OpenAI GPT-4 API.
Criteria for eligibility:
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
All patients undergoing radiotherapy in the pelvic region.
Exclusion Criteria:
Cases of pelvic reirradiation or operated cases.
Gender:
All
Minimum age:
18 Years
Maximum age:
N/A
Healthy volunteers:
No
Locations:
Facility:
Name:
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva - INCA
Address:
City:
Rio De Janeiro
Country:
Brazil
Status:
Recruiting
Contact:
Last name:
Rachele Rachele Grazziotin, MD
Start date:
July 22, 2024
Completion date:
December 15, 2024
Lead sponsor:
Agency:
jaide
Agency class:
Industry
Collaborator:
Agency:
National Cancer Institute, Brazil
Agency class:
Other
Source:
jaide
Record processing date:
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on November 12, 2024
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov page:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06525181