Experimental melanoma drug response depends on tumor size

Experimental melanoma drug response depends on tumor size

2 Jun 2014

Scientists relate the difference between the responses to an experimental immunotherapy melanoma treatment primarily to the size of the tumor before treatment.

In particular, researchers at Mayo Clinic in Florida found that the size of tumors before treatment was the strongest variable while examining why some advanced melanoma patients respond so well to the experimental immunotherapy "MK-3475", while others have a less robust response.

They say their findings offered several clinical insights that could lead to different treatment strategies and perhaps influence staging of advanced melanoma.

"This was the first robust assessment to determine the impact of baseline tumor size on clinical endpoints in patients with metastatic melanoma -- in particular -- those receiving MK-3475. Our findings suggest the location of spread is less important than the amount of tumor that is present before treatment," says the study's lead investigator, Richard W. Joseph, M.D., an oncologist at Mayo Clinic in Florida.

Metastatic melanoma staging

Metastatic melanoma is currently staged primarily according to where the cancer has spread -- Stage 4a if melanoma has spread to distant skin, Stage 4b if the cancer has reached the lungs, and Stage 4c when melanoma has spread to other organs, such as the liver or bones. In general, prognosis for Stage 4a is best and for Stage 4c is worst.

"The traditional staging system does not account for the total volume of disease or baseline tumor burden," Dr. Joseph says. "For instance, a Stage 4b patient with metastases only to the lung would be expected to have a better prognosis than a patient with Stage 4c. However, a patient with a large volume of disease in the lung may, in fact, have a worse prognosis than someone with a small volume of disease in the liver," Dr. Joseph says.

"That is not to say this drug doesn't work in patients with a large amount of disease. However, the efficacy is significantly less than in those with small volume disease," he says. "While this may seem intuitive, this was the first robust analysis of its kind."

Details on the study's results

The likely reason for this finding is that MK-3475 is a monoclonal antibody that stimulates the body's immune system response to the tumors, Dr. Joseph says. "But the immune system can get overwhelmed when there is too much tumor, and not work as effectively as possible," he says. "Some tumors have evolved to both evade and turn off nearby immune cells. MK-3475 provides a shield for the immune cells so that they can remain active when they reach the tumor."

The drug is also being investigated in lung, bladder and kidney cancer. "The implications of these findings are that perhaps decreasing the baseline tumor size through surgery or other means and then treating with MK-3475 may be a more effective means of inducing long-lasting remissions," he says. Follow-up studies will be necessary to explore this strategy, he adds.

While Dr. Joseph led this study, he is a part of a team of international researchers studying the drug, which he says has offered patients with metastatic melanoma "truly impressive results." In a phase I clinical trial, overall survival one year after treatment was 81 percent.

"In the past, immunotherapies were associated with relatively high toxicities and provided meaningful clinical benefit to the minority of patients. MK-3475 and other drugs like it are revolutionizing the way we treat metastatic melanoma by benefitting a much larger segment of the population as well as having very few side effects," says Dr. Joseph.


Source: Science Daily

Login to your account

Did you forget your password?